Re: dfmgr additional ABI version fields - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: dfmgr additional ABI version fields
Date
Msg-id YZdZPPoIRTkgnGzH@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: dfmgr additional ABI version fields  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: dfmgr additional ABI version fields
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 12:50:38PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I'm not a different vendor, but I do work on different code than you
> do, and I like this. Advanced Server accidentally dodges this problem
> at present by shipping with a different FUNC_MAX_ARGS value, but this
> is much cleaner.

I am pretty sure that Greenplum could benefit from something like
that.  As a whole, using a string looks like a good idea for that.

> Would it be reasonable to consider something similar for the control
> file, for the benefit of distributions that are not the same on disk?

Hmm.  Wouldn't that cause more harm than actual benefits?
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: wait event and archive_command
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: issue in pgfdw_report_error()?