On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 03:43:00PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Mikhail <mp39590@gmail.com> writes:
> > In your patch I've removed testing for 5.x versions, because official
> > releases are supported only for one year, no need to worry about them.
>
> Official support or no, we have OpenBSD 5.9 in our buildfarm, so
> ignoring the case isn't going to fly.
5.9 has support for unnamed POSIX semas. Do you think new machine with
OpenBSD <5.5 (when unnamed POSIX semas were introduced) can appear in
buildfarm or be used by real customer?
I have no objections on testing "openbsd5.[01234]" and using SysV semas
there and can redo and test the patch, but isn't it over caution?
