Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility
Date
Msg-id YUrf9sd4xoPfjQuf@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
Responses Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 02:04:23PM +0200, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
> On 10 Aug 2021, at 15:27, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>
>> These have now been committed, when OpenSSL 3.0.0 ships and there is coverage
>> in the buildfarm I’ll revisit this for the backbranches.
>
> As an update to this, I’ve tested the tree frozen for the upcoming 3.0.0
> release (scheduled for today AFAIK) and postgres still builds and tests clean
> with the patches that were applied.

I think that the time to do a backpatch of 318df8 has come.  caiman,
that runs Fedora 35, has just failed:
https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=caiman&dt=2021-09-22%2006%3A28%3A00

Here is a diff:
@@ -8,168 +8,88 @@
 decode('0000000000000000', 'hex'),
 decode('0000000000000000', 'hex'),
 'bf-ecb/pad:none'), 'hex');
-      encode
-------------------
- 4ef997456198dd78
-(1 row)
-
+ERROR:  encrypt error: Cipher cannot be initialized ?

And if I look at the list of packages at the top of Fedora, I see an
update to OpenSSL 3.0.0:
https://fedora.pkgs.org/rawhide/fedora-aarch64/openssl-libs-3.0.0-1.fc36.aarch64.rpm.html

So the coverage is here.  HEAD passes, not the stabele branches.  At
least for 14 it would be nice to do that before the release of next
week.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: Save user's original authenticated identity for logging
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility