Re: Introduce pg_receivewal gzip compression tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Introduce pg_receivewal gzip compression tests
Date
Msg-id YO/coGVNAZTARxEw@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Introduce pg_receivewal gzip compression tests  (gkokolatos@pm.me)
Responses Re: Introduce pg_receivewal gzip compression tests  (gkokolatos@pm.me)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 02:11:09PM +0000, gkokolatos@pm.me wrote:
> Please find v6 attached.

Thanks.  I have spent some time checking this stuff in details, and
I did some tests on Windows while on it.  A run of pgperltidy was
missing.  A second thing is that you added one useless WAL segment
switch in the ZLIB block, and two at the end, causing the first two in
the set of three (one in the ZLIB block and one in the final command)
to be no-ops as they followed a previous WAL switch.  The final one
was not needed as no WAL is generated after that.

And applied.  Let's see if the buildfarm has anything to say.  Perhaps
this will even catch some bugs that pre-existed.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: VACUUM (DISABLE_PAGE_SKIPPING on)
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove redundant Assert(PgArchPID == 0); in PostmasterStateMachine