Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: [PATCH] We install pg_regress and isolationtester but not pg_isolation_regress - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: [PATCH] We install pg_regress and isolationtester but not pg_isolation_regress
Date
Msg-id YIobCjdi1Wq2KyDi@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] We install pg_regress and isolationtester but not pg_isolation_regress  (Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] We install pg_regress and isolationtester but not pg_isolation_regress  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 12:44:45PM +0300, Aleksander Alekseev wrote:
> I just wanted to let you know that TimescaleDB uses
> pg_isolation_regress and occasionally there are reports from some
> suffering/puzzled users/developers, e.g. [1]. Not 100% sure if it
> makes investing the time into backpatching worth it. However if
> someone could do it, it would be nice.

FWIW, I am not really sure that this is important enough to justify a
back-patch, even it is true that there have been cases in the past
where extra binaries got added in minor releases.
--
Michael
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: WAL prefetch (another approach)
Next
From: "tanghy.fnst@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: [BUG]"FailedAssertion" reported in lazy_scan_heap() when running logical replication