On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 09:16:49PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> It looks like even though the commit e5253fdc4f that added the
> parallel_leader_participation GUC correctly categorized it as
> RESOURCES_ASYNCHRONOUS parameter in the code, but in the docs it is kept
> under irrelevant section i.e. "Query Planning/Other Planner Options". This
> is reported in the bugs list [1], cc-ed the reporter.
>
> Attaching a small patch that moves the GUC description to the right place.
> Thoughts?
I would keep the discussion on the existing thread rather than spawn a
new one on -hackers for exactly the same problem, so I'll reply there
in a minute.
--
Michael
