On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 06:43:44PM +0000, Bossart, Nathan wrote:
> I changed it to PROCESS_TOAST.
Thanks. PROCESS_TOAST sounds good to me at the end for the option
name, so let's just go with that.
> Done.
While on it, I could not resist with changing VACOPT_SKIPTOAST to
VACOPT_PROCESS_TOAST on consistency grounds. This is used only in
four places in the code, so that's not invasive.
What do you think?
--
Michael
