On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 10:56:29AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Yep, seems OK to me, assuming that, as you say, you'll update the
> comments again when they are used to handle the concurrent cases.
That's the idea. I need first to look in depth at what's proposed on
the other thread for REINDEX, but I see no reason why the case of
REINDEX CONCURRENTLY would not be able to use this stuff. Applied
this part for now. Thanks.
--
Michael
