On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 07:55:53PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 12:31 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>> Oops. It looks like you are right here. This would impact the
>> calculation of CheckPointSegments on reload when
>> checkpoint_completion_target is updated. This is wrong since we've
>> switched to max_wal_size as of 88e9823, so this had better be
>> backpatched all the way down.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> +1 to backpatch as setting checkpoint_completion_target will not take
> effect immediately.
Okay, applied down to 11. I have double-checked the surroundings to
see if there was a similar mistake or something hiding around
CheckpointSegments but noticed nothing (also did some primary/standby
pgbench-ing with periodic reloads of checkpoint_completion_target,
while on it).
--
Michael
