On Tue, Dec 06, 2022 at 05:28:47AM +0100, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
> Fields renaming was mandatory in the previous ones as there was
> already a mix of with/without "n_" in the existing fields names.
>
> That said, I think it's better to rename the fields as you did (to
> be "consistent" on the naming between relation/db stats), so the
> patch LGTM.
Yeah, PgStat_StatDBEntry is the last one using this style, so I have
kept my change with the variables renamed rather than painting more
CppConcat()s. The functions are still named the same as the original
ones.
--
Michael
