Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it. - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From hubert depesz lubaczewski
Subject Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
Date
Msg-id Y3JBktH7QS0fVOL5@depesz.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 06:41:59PM +0530, Amit Kapila wrote:
> From the last two lines above, it is clear why it started working. The
> restart_lsn has advanced from 1039D/83825958 to 1039D/9170B010 which
> means the system no longer needs data from 000000010001039D00000083.

Sure, but how could it advance if the wal wasn't there?

Best regards,

depesz




pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.
Next
From: hubert depesz lubaczewski
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL segments removed from primary despite the fact that logical replication slot needs it.