On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 02:58:43PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> I don't think that's an improvement. With this patch if you see the
> "paral_planned_not_exec" counter going up, you still don't know if this is
> because of the !es_use_parallel_mode or if you simply have too many parallel
> queries running at the same time, or both, and therefore can't do much with
> that information. Both situations are different and in my opinion require
> different (and specialized) counters to properly handle them.
This thread has been idle for a few weeks now, and this feedback has
not been answered to. This CF entry has been marked as RwF.
--
Michael
