Re: DDL result is lost by CREATE DATABASE with WAL_LOG strategy - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: DDL result is lost by CREATE DATABASE with WAL_LOG strategy
Date
Msg-id Y/WMTGh070EHHrjv@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: DDL result is lost by CREATE DATABASE with WAL_LOG strategy  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: DDL result is lost by CREATE DATABASE with WAL_LOG strategy
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 10:00:11AM -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> What is the purpose of testing it without the checkpoint?

Perhaps none, I was wondering whether it would be worth testing that
with the flush phase, but perhaps that's just extra cycles wasted at
this point.

> Other than that
> question, the patch looks reasonable to me.

Okay, applied and backpatched with a minimal test set, then.  I have
kept the tweaks I did to the tests with extra comments.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi
Date:
Subject: Re: "out of relcache_callback_list slots" after multiple calls to pg_logical_slot_get_binary_changes
Next
From: Justin Pryzby
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_stat_bgwriter.buffers_backend is pretty meaningless (and more?)