Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft - Mailing list pgsql-benchmarks

From Randolf Richardson
Subject Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
Date
Msg-id Xns95D8C5C3CEC15rr8xca@200.46.204.72
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft  (ycrevecoeur@nyc.rr.com)
List pgsql-benchmarks
"ycrevecoeur@nyc.rr.com" wrote in pgsql.benchmarks:

[sNip]
> It really depends on the job at hand.
>
> If this is for a super critical environment and the database is gonna
> get pounded really hard then go with Oracle if you have the budget
> otherwise PostgreSQL should do fine although Microsoft has nice
> development tools.

        Unfortunately "nice development tools" has absolutely nothing to do
with "super critical" and "gonna get pounded really hard."

        And with regards to the development tools, I actually find the
Microsoft tools not to my liking because they tend to keep the developer from
knowing what's really going on "under the hood" -- my preference is a
straight text editor to edit the source, compile/make, then see the results
(and only get into debugging as needed), thus fancy development tools are
mostly a waste of time for me (I'm happy with my text editor called "MEd").

> http://www.devx.com/dbzone/Article/20743

        I'll take a look at that.  Thanks for the link.

pgsql-benchmarks by date:

Previous
From: ycrevecoeur@nyc.rr.com
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
Next
From: Randolf Richardson
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft