RE: [INTERFACES] The persistance of C functions - Mailing list pgsql-interfaces

From Craig Orsinger
Subject RE: [INTERFACES] The persistance of C functions
Date
Msg-id XFMail.000209141919.orsingerc@epg-gw1.lewis.army.mil
Whole thread Raw
In response to The persistance of C functions  ("Bryan White" <bryan@arcamax.com>)
List pgsql-interfaces
On 09-Feb-00 Bryan White wrote:
> If I use CREATE FUNCTION for a C function in a .so file and then use the
> function and then change and recompile the function, what steps are needed
> to see the change?
> 
> As I see it the options are:
> A: do nothing, the function is reloaded on every invocation.
> B: Reopen the connection to the backend
> C: Restart the postmaster
> 
> I suspect B is correct but I would like to hear someone confirm it.
       I don't know about A or B, but C definitely works :-). If it's
practical, I sometimes use DROP FUNCTION/CREATE FUNCTION, but I don't
think this is practical when you're using this function (or set of 
functions) to implement a new data type.

----------------------------------
Date: 09-Feb-00  Time: 14:16:54

Craig Orsinger                  (email: <orsingerc@epg-gw1.lewis.army.mil>)
Logicon RDA
Bldg. 8B28                      "Just another megalomaniac with ideas above his
6th & F Streets                 station. The Universe is full of them."
Ft. Lewis, WA   98433                   - The Doctor
----------------------------------


pgsql-interfaces by date:

Previous
From: Lars
Date:
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] jdbc question
Next
From: "Ken J. Wright"
Date:
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] jdbc question