On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 12:01:38PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 8:15 AM Bharath Rupireddy
>> I tried to make it consistent by issuing NOTICE (not an error) even
>> for EXPLAIN/EXPLAIN ANALYZE IF NOT EXISTS case. If issue notice and
>> exit from the ExplainOneUtility, we could output an empty plan to the
>> user because, by now ExplainResultDesc would have been called at the
>> start of the explain via PortalStart(). I didn't find a clean way of
>> coding if we are not okay to show notice and empty plan to the user.
>>
>> Any suggestions on achieving above?
I was looking at your patch today, and I actually found the conclusion
to output an empty plan while issuing a NOTICE to be quite intuitive
if the caller uses IF NOT EXISTS with EXPLAIN.
> Attaching v3 patch that also contains test cases. Please review it further.
Thanks for adding some test cases! Some of them were exact
duplicates, so it is possible to reduce the number of queries without
impacting the coverage. I have also chosen a query that forces an
error within the planner.
Please see the attached. IF NOT EXISTS implies that CTAS or CREATE
MATVIEW will never ERROR if the relation already exists, with or
without EXPLAIN, EXECUTE or WITH NO DATA, so that gets us a consistent
behavior across all the patterns.
Note: I'd like to think that we could choose a better name for
CheckRelExistenceInCTAS().
--
Michael
