On 2017-06-13 22:23, Tom Lane wrote:
> I could not find any places where reverting this change made the
> results worse, so I'm unclear on why you made it.
I must admit I'm a bit confused about why it's not fixed yet, but I'll
have to analyze that later this week. But the idea was to convince
indent that the following is not a declaration and therefore it
shouldn't be formatted as such:
typedef void (*voidptr) (int *);
