RE: Failed transaction statistics to measure the logical replication progress - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com
Subject RE: Failed transaction statistics to measure the logical replication progress
Date
Msg-id TYCPR01MB8373D7AE0B6C62E5CDB03C6CED989@TYCPR01MB8373.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Failed transaction statistics to measure the logical replication progress  ("osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com" <osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com>)
Responses RE: Failed transaction statistics to measure the logical replication progress
List pgsql-hackers
On Monday, November 15, 2021 6:28 PM I wrote:
> On Thursday, November 11, 2021 9:47 PM vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Few more comments:
...
> Fixed. Also, its name was too long
> when aligned with other PgStat_StatDBEntry memebers.
> Thus I renamed it as subworkers_preparedsizes.
> 
> This depends on v21 in [1]
Hi

There was some minor conflict error by the change of v22 in [1].
I've conducted some update for this.
(The rebased part is only C code and checked by pgindent)

[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAD21AoCE72vKXJp99f4xRw7Mh5ve-Z2roe21gP8Y82_CxXKvbg%40mail.gmail.com


Best Regards,
    Takamichi Osumi


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: Add connection active, idle time to pg_stat_activity
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: parallel vacuum comments