Hi,
> > I noticed that we didn't collect the ObjectAddress returned by
> > ATExec[Attach|Detach]Partition. I think collecting this information can make it
> > easier for users to get the partition OID of the attached or detached table in
> > the event trigger. So how about collecting it like the attached patch ?
>
> Added to next CF.
Sounds good. I grepped ATExecXXX() functions called in ATExecCmd(),
and I confirmed that all returned values have been collected except them.
While checking test code test about EVENT TRIGGER,
I found there were no tests related with partitions in that.
How about adding them?
Best Regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED
