Dear Ikeda-san,
This patch cannot be applied to the HEAD, but anyway I put a comment.
```
+ /*
+ * Measure i/o timing to fsync WAL data.
+ *
+ * The wal receiver skip to collect it to avoid performance degradation of standy servers.
+ * If sync_method doesn't have its fsync method, to skip too.
+ */
+ if (!AmWalReceiverProcess() && track_wal_io_timing && fsyncMethodCalled())
+ INSTR_TIME_SET_CURRENT(start);
```
I think m_wal_sync_time should be collected even if the process is WalRecevier.
Because all wal_fsync should be recorded, and
some performance issues have been aleady occurred if track_wal_io_timing is turned on.
I think it's strange only to take care of the walrecevier case.
Best Regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED