From: Andrey V. Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru>
> I tried to use 1E4 - 1E8 rows in a tuple buffer. But the results weren't
> impressive.
I guess that's because the 64 KB threshold came first.
> We can use one more GUC instead of a precompiled constant.
Yes, agreed.
> > Why don't we focus on committing the basic part and addressing the
> extended part (0003 and 0004) separately later?
> I focused only on the 0001 and 0002 patches.
> > As Tang-san and you showed, the basic part already demonstrated
> impressive improvement. If there's no objection, I'd like to make this ready for
> committer in a few days.
> Good.
Glad to hear that.
Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa
