From: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>
> While testing the patch on some workload, I realized that
> XLOG_FPI_FOR_HINT record could still be emitted even when wal_level =
> none. IIUC that WAL record is not necessary during wal_level = none
> since the server cannot be the primary server and the server crash
> ends up requiring to restore the whole database.
Nice catch! XLOG_FPI_FOR_HINT and XLOG_FPI should be eliminated, otherwise large amount of WAL may be written. (It
seemsthat other RMIDs than RM_XLOG_ID and RM_XACT_ID do not have to be written.)
I'm afraid "none" doesn't represent the behavior because RM_XLOG_ID and RM_XACT_ID WAL records, except for XLOG_FPI_*,
areemitted. What's the good name? IIUC, "minimal" is named after the fact that the minimal amount of WAL necessary
forcrash recovery is generated. "norecovery" or "unrecoverable"?
Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa
