From: Jamison, Kirk/ジャミソン カーク <k.jamison@fujitsu.com>
> However, I still can't seem to find the cause of why the non-recovery
> performance does not change when compared to master. (1 min 15 s for the
> given test case below)
Can you check and/or try the following?
1. Isn't the vacuum cost delay working?
VACUUM command should run without sleeping with the default settings. Just in case, can you try with the settings:
vacuum_cost_delay = 0
vacuum_cost_limit = 10000
2. Buffer strategy
The non-recovery VACUUM can differ from that of recovery in the use of shared buffers. The VACUUM command uses only
256KB of shared buffers. To make VACUUM command use the whole shared buffers, can you modify
src/backend/commands/vacuum.cso that GetAccessStrategy()'s argument is changed to BAS_VACUUM to BAS_NORMAL? (I don't
havemuch hope about this, though, because all blocks of the relations are already cached in shared buffers when VACUUM
isrun.)
Can you measure the time DropRelFileNodeBuffers()? You can call GetTimestamp() at the beginning and end of the
function,and use TimestampDifference() to calculate the difference. Then, for instance, elog(WARNING, "time is |
%u.%u",sec, usec) at the end of the function. You can use any elog() print format for your convenience to write shell
commandsto filter the lines and sum up the total.
Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa
