Dear Peter,
Thanks for giving your idea!
> > Subscriber has a different meaning of subscription. Subscription is an SQL
> > object. Subscriber is the server (node in replication terminology) where the
> > subscription resides. Having said that pg_createsubscriber doesn't seem
> > a bad
> > name because you are creating a new subscriber. (Indeed, you are
> > transforming /
> > converting but "create" seems closer and users can infer that it is a
> > tool to
> > build a new logical replica.
>
> That makes sense.
>
> (Also, the problem with "convert" etc. is that "convertsubscriber" would
> imply that you are converting an existing subscriber to something else.
> It would need to be something like "convertbackup" then, which doesn't
> seem helpful.)
>
> > I think "convert" and "transform" fit for this case. However, "create",
> > "convert" and "transform" have 6, 7 and 9 characters, respectively. I
> > suggest
> > that we avoid long names (subscriber already has 10 characters). My
> > preference
> > is pg_createsubscriber.
>
> That seems best to me.
Just FYI - I'm ok to change the name to pg_createsubscriber.
Best Regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED
