Re: Transaction timeout - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Japin Li
Subject Re: Transaction timeout
Date
Msg-id SY8PR01MB9288F5CF03D38662BE59C628B68AA@SY8PR01MB9288.ausprd01.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Transaction timeout  ("Andrey M. Borodin" <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>)
Responses Re: Transaction timeout
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 07 Dec 2023 at 20:40, Andrey M. Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
>> On 7 Dec 2023, at 06:25, Japin Li <japinli@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>  If idle_in_transaction_timeout is bigger than transaction_timeout,
>> the idle-in-transaction timeout don't needed, right?
> Yes, I think so.
>

Should we disable the idle_in_transaction_timeout in this case? Of cursor, I'm
not strongly insist on this.

I think you forget disable transaction_timeout in AutoVacWorkerMain().
If not, can you elaborate on why you don't disable it?

--
Regrads,
Japin Li
ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co., Ltd.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Rename ShmemVariableCache and initialize it in more standard way
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum