Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Curt Sampson
Subject Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Date
Msg-id Pine.NEB.4.44.0209161255170.654-100000@angelic.cynic.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 15 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> The problem with the non-symlink solution is that it is error-prone/ugly
> on all the platforms, not just NT4.X.

Actually, it's really just the environment variable solution that's
error prone, I think. Putting it in the config file is fine. It's
just a matter of someone coding it.

cjs
-- 
Curt Sampson  <cjs@cynic.net>   +81 90 7737 2974   http://www.netbsd.org   Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're
alllight.  --XTC
 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal for resolving casting issues
Next
From: Justin Clift
Date:
Subject: Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?