On 5 Sep 2002, Greg Copeland wrote:
> Sounds like a mechanism to make the distinction between virtual (child
> can override parent) and non-virtual (child is constrained by the
> parent) constraints are needed.
Oh, I should mention that I have no problem with being able to declare a
constraint "overridable" by subtables, so long as it's not the default,
and it's clear from the table definition that it might be overridden.
cjs
--
Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're
alllight. --XTC
