On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Yea, you have to question what value the discussion has, really. We
> have users of inheritance that like it. If we can get a TODO item out
> of the disucssion, great, but there doesn't seem to be any direction of
> where the discussion is heading.
Summary:
1. The current implementation is broken.
2. We have no proper description of how a "fixed" implementation should work.
3. It's hard to fix the current implementation without such a description.
4. Thus, we are in other messages here trying to work out the model and come up with such a description.
5. The people working this out at the moment appear to be me, Greg Copeland and Hannu Krosing.
cjs
--
Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're
alllight. --XTC
