Re: WAL file location - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Curt Sampson
Subject Re: WAL file location
Date
Msg-id Pine.NEB.4.44.0207301314000.456-100000@angelic.cynic.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WAL file location  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Tom Lane wrote:

> More generally, I do not like depending on postmaster environment
> variables --- our experience with environment variables for database
> locations has been uniformly bad....
> The existing secondary-location mechanism is horrible.  Please do not
> emulate it...

Right. I get really, really worried about security issues when I see
something like "just specify an environment variable." Who knows what
the heck else is in the environment.

I'd really like to see that removed and replaced with a configuration file
or something similar.

cjs
-- 
Curt Sampson  <cjs@cynic.net>   +81 90 7737 2974   http://www.netbsd.org   Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're
alllight.  --XTC
 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Curt Sampson
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL file location
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Password sub-process ...