Re: [GENERAL] advice on buying sun hardware to run postgres - Mailing list pgsql-general

From dustin sallings
Subject Re: [GENERAL] advice on buying sun hardware to run postgres
Date
Msg-id Pine.NEB.4.10.9904252129010.13342-100000@mobile
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] advice on buying sun hardware to run postgres  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] advice on buying sun hardware to run postgres  (Jim Jennis <jhjennis@shentel.net>)
List pgsql-general
On Sun, 25 Apr 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:

// IDE is just plain slow on Unix.  Unix does much better with SCSI,
// especially when there are multiple disks.

    Although it's not as obvious to most home users, UNIX does much
better on RISC processors, too.  Although a CISC processor can often
execute a single process faster, once you get into having to try to do
multiprocessing, the RISC is a big win.  Anyone who's ever run a machine
up to a load of around 100-150 knows all about this.  :)

    If you're not willing to spend money on Sun hardware, though, it's
hard to see a gain.  With similarly priced hardware, the PC will often be
faster, but you can make some nice high-end server.  I'm running a
postgres server at work on a 2 processor Ultra 2 with a gig or so of RAM.
My actual database servers at work have at least 4 Ultra processors with
4GB of RAM, but they (most of them) will hold up to 14 processors and 14GB
of RAM.

--
Principal Member Technical Staff, beyond.com    The world is watching America,
pub  1024/3CAE01D5 1994/11/03 Dustin Sallings <dustin@spy.net>
|    Key fingerprint =  87 02 57 08 02 D0 DA D6  C8 0F 3E 65 51 98 D8 BE
L______________________________________________ and America is watching TV. __


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] advice on buying sun hardware to run postgres
Next
From: Eric Enockson
Date:
Subject: postgresql user gallery