On Tue, 24 Feb 1998, Jan Wieck wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 24 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > > Actually, I'm not married to db_* for views...it was a "quick fix"
> > > > to ensure that things still worked. Whatever we decide on, both Julie and
> > > > Peter, at a minimum, need to know relatively soon. I know in Julie's
> > > > case, she does do a call to pg_user...I let her know tonight that she
> > > > needs to change it to db_user, for the *current* code...
> > >
> > > Good. I didn't want the db_ namespace pollution. I will call it
> > > pg_user_no_passwd, and make it a view, not a rule. Is that OK with
> > > everyone?
> >
> > Works for me...
>
> How? When I create a view the way Bruce explained (update pg_class),
> my backend crashes on SELECT FROM view during the rewrite. For some
> reason the rewrite handler cannot get the rule locks correctly.
Ppl are taking me a slight bit too literally :( "Works for
me"...I like the idea...not necessarily implemented it though :)
