Re: separating improperly grouped page views - Mailing list pgsql-sql
| From | Jeff Frost |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: separating improperly grouped page views |
| Date | |
| Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.64.0707051007410.31414@discord.home.frostconsultingllc.com Whole thread Raw |
| In response to | Re: separating improperly grouped page views (Jeff Frost <jeff@frostconsultingllc.com>) |
| List | pgsql-sql |
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007, Jeff Frost wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> Jeff Frost <jeff@frostconsultingllc.com> writes:
>>> [ umpteen million iterations of: ]
>>> -> Limit (cost=0.00..367.09 rows=1 width=8)
>>> -> Index Scan Backward using page_view_stamp_idx on
>>> page_view pv2 (cost=0.00..158215.86 rows=431 width=8)
>>> Index Cond: (stamp < $1)
>>> Filter: ((stamp IS NOT NULL) AND (visit_id =
>>> $0))
>>
>> Perhaps an index on (visit_id, stamp) would help. This one is doing the
>> best it can, but if the visit_id's you want are thinly scattered, it'll
>> still suck...
>
> Good idea Tom! In fact the planner seems to like that much better:
>
> Seq Scan on page_view pv1 (cost=0.00..11529031.34 rows=3580205 width=239)
> vs
> Seq Scan on page_view pv1 (cost=0.00..2622541458.55 rows=3596473 width=237)
Now that this is working in a reasonable amount of time to process the entire
data set, I need to work out how to process the new information that comes in
every so often and still assign it a correct visit_id until the fix for this
can get through QA. The cleanup query looks like this:
CREATE TEMP TABLE tmpmaxpvid AS SELECT MAX(id) AS id FROM
reporting.page_view_clean;
INSERT INTO reporting.page_view_clean
SELECT id , CASE WHEN stamp - last_stamp > INTERVAL '1 hour' OR last_stamp IS NULL THEN
nextval('reporting.tracking_cleanup_seq') ELSE currval('reporting.tracking_cleanup_seq') END AS visit_id
,uri , params , stamp , visit_id AS old_visit_id FROM ( SELECT id , visit_id , uri
,params , stamp , ( SELECT MAX(pv2.stamp) FROM page_view pv2 WHERE pv2.visit_id
= pv1.visit_id AND pv2.stamp < pv1.stamp ) AS last_stamp FROM page_view pv1
WHERE pv1.stamp < now() - INTERVAL '1 hour' AND pv1.id > ( SELECT CASE
WHEN id IS NULL THEN 0 ELSE id END AS id FROM
tmpmaxpvid ) ORDER BY pv1.visit_id , pv1.stamp ) x;
The problem is the page_views that straddle the time before and after the
query get an artificially different visit_id.
This case statement is what kills me:
CASE WHEN stamp - last_stamp > INTERVAL '1 hour' OR last_stamp IS NULL THEN
nextval('reporting.tracking_cleanup_seq') ELSE currval('reporting.tracking_cleanup_seq') END AS visit_id
If I change it to this:
CASE WHEN last_stamp IS NULL THEN visit_id WHEN stamp - last_stamp > INTERVAL '1 hour'
THEN nextval('reporting.tracking_cleanup_seq') ELSE currval('reporting.tracking_cleanup_seq') END AS
visit_id
Then it gives the first page_view in the sequence the correct visit_id, but
then continues on with a different visit_id for the rest.
I've also tried changing how I select which data to act on like so:
WHERE pv1.id > ( SELECT CASE WHEN id IS NULL THEN 0 ELSE id
END AS id FROM tmpmaxpvid ) AND pv1.visit_id IN ( SELECT visit_id FROM
page_viewpv3 GROUP BY visit_id HAVING max(stamp) < now() - INTERVAL '1 hour' )
ORDERBY pv1.visit_id , pv1.stamp ) x;
But that leaves me skipping some page views because they haven't reached their
conclusion and because of the id > clause, I'll never go back to see them.
Anyone have any suggestions?
--
Jeff Frost, Owner <jeff@frostconsultingllc.com>
Frost Consulting, LLC http://www.frostconsultingllc.com/
Phone: 650-780-7908 FAX: 650-649-1954