Re: Postgres Replication - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ben
Subject Re: Postgres Replication
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.64.0701091416590.8626@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Postgres Replication  ("dcrespo" <dcrespo@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Postgres Replication  ("dcrespo" <dcrespo@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
If you only want to use one database at a time you might look into using
DRBD. It's a linux block-level package that is like raid-1 over the
network.

On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, dcrespo wrote:

> Hi everybody,
>
> I have two computers with a Postgres Database each. I want one of them
> to be the replica of the other one; let's say I want a Master to Master
> replication in order to use either one (but only one at a time) as the
> main database: in case of failure, switch. The ideal synchronization
> way would be Synchronous. However, these two computers are going to be
> next to each other, so the asynchronous synchronization would be fast
> enough (I don't really know. Can you tell so?) for the case synchronous
> sync is not available.
>
> What I have found so far is Daffodil and Slony-I. Daffodil's name
> doesn't even appear in Postgresql.org, which is not the case for
> Slony-I. So there's a big point in favor to Slony-I.
>
> Has anybody researched on this that can point me in the right
> direction?
>
> Thanks a lot,
>
> Daniel Crespo
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: Array constructor requires one argument
Next
From: Bruno Wolff III
Date:
Subject: Re: Newbie Constraint ?