On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 04:09:21PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> > Unless we can convince ourselves that array-of-UNKNOWN is not dangerous,
> > I don't think this is easily solved.
>
> One possibility that might handle Martijn's problem is to allow the
> construct
>
> ARRAY[]::type[]
>
> that is, you can have an empty ARRAY construct only if you immediately
> cast it to a specific array type. The application typically knows what
> type the data is anyway, and if it just always plasters on the cast then
> the syntax would work regardless of whether there are any elements or not.
+1 for doing it this way :)
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666
Skype: davidfetter
Remember to vote!
