Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.61.0504020931090.22843@hosting.commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, 2 Apr 2005, Peter Eisentraut wrote:

> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Oh you do need PHP installed you just don't need the source. As
>> everyone knows ;) I am not a c-programmer and I do not know the finer
>> details. I can of course find out from my developers.
>
> Well, that doesn't solve the circular build dependency issue then.
> Before you can install PHP you already need PostgreSQL (libpq)
> installed.  So nothing relevant to that issue has changed, as far as I
> can see.

Uhhmmm no? You only need libpq installed if you want postgresql client
side support but I will double check.

Actually as I think about it... that is not the case even now. When we
download the php source the base configure before compile is:

./configure --disable-all

Thus no use of PostgreSQL whatsoever.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake



>
>

-- 
Co-Founder
Command Prompt, Inc.
The wheel's spinning but the hamster's dead


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] plPHP in core?