bitwise and/or aggregate functions? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fabien COELHO
Subject bitwise and/or aggregate functions?
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.58.0404271807140.28436@sablons.cri.ensmp.fr
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: bitwise and/or aggregate functions?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Dear hackers,

still in the spirit of "it may be useful to others, as it was to me, and
it does cost very little", and before submitting a small patch and being
exploded because it is obviously very stupid:

Would it be appropriate to contribute BIT_AND and BIT_OR aggregates
for integer types, with some documentation and minimal validation?
There has been a discussion recently on pgsql-general about that.

1) mysql has them... it seems to be an argument here around sometimes;-)  it is in their proud list-of-features that it
hasand that postgresql  does not have.
 

2) each declaration is a 4-line "CREATE AGGREGATE", the underlying  functions being already available for & and |
operators.

3) I know that one can add them if they are needed, but what  would be the point of NOT providing such simple features,
and having the basic user to have to learn about creating aggregate  functions and browse a long time in the
documentationfor that?
 

I needed them for some application: I'm happy I know how to add them now,
but I would have been even happier if I had found them just available
without having to learn about these intesting details about postgresql
extensions.

Have a nice day,

-- 
Fabien Coelho - coelho@cri.ensmp.fr


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tim Conrad
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] What can we learn from MySQL?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] What can we learn from MySQL?