Re: 7.4 features list - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
From | Brian |
---|---|
Subject | Re: 7.4 features list |
Date | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.50.0305100735410.20166-100000@lyra Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: 7.4 features list (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>) |
Responses |
Re: 7.4 features list
|
List | pgsql-hackers |
As a postgresql user, and as someone who develops apps with postgresql, but does not do development FOR postgresql, I feel compelled to chime in here and agree. While I understand that there is a strong opinion that a win32 port will bring more attention to postgresql, and that this is a good thing, I would hate to see a release get delayed because of the port. I have several production systems using postgresql up and running now. One of these systems has been running for over a year and a half, with no downtime other than scheduled downtime for upgrades, and one hardware failure. In spite of this, I still have to fight constant political battles to keep this application on postgresql. Upper managers who have never heard of postgresql constantly comment about how maybe it would be better if we just used sybase or oracle, etc. Each new feature that gets released for postgresql gives me a little more ammunition to use in these discussions. Currently, the too biggest areas of contention are replication and just the "I've never heard of this 'postgres'" factor. While I know that replication is not coming for 7.4, I think that PITR would help. At least it would facilitate faster / easier recovery after a crash... not that I've ever had a crash. I have to think I'm not the only person in this sort of situation. While the win32 port may be very beneficial, I would hate to see a situation where the current installed base had to wait for a feature they needed because of the win32 port. Please, this is not meant to disparage the hard work of the win32 porters at all. I understand that bringing a wider user base into the fold can in the long term result in more resources to help continue to improve postgresql. I'm just saying that I would not want to see new features for the existing ports of postgresql put on hold because of a desire to have win32 in the next release, if it came down to that situation. I'd like to thank everyone involved in the postgresql project for creating such a fantastic tool! Brian Knox brian@mail.pantalaimon.net On Thu, 8 May 2003, Jan Wieck wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > [...] > > months ago, and they're not done. That gives me no confidence that > > they'll meet the next deadline we set. If September comes and we still > > have no working Win32 port, will you vote to delay again? > > I have to agree on this. Things like the Win32 port tend to take longer > and longer. With a release schedule every 3-6 months they'll just get > released whenever they're done. To hold back other improvements because > of them is not right. > > > Jan > > -- > #======================================================================# > # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # > # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # > #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com # > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org) >
pgsql-hackers by date: