Re: set returning function - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Dennis Bjorklund
Subject Re: set returning function
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0505091853470.7072-100000@zigo.dhs.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: set returning function  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: set returning function  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Mon, 9 May 2005, Tom Lane wrote:

> > Bug?
>
> Unimplemented feature.

Is

   SELECT 42, srf();

the same as

   SELECT 42, * FROM srf();

?

In my view the first version is an error. It's not like you can put a
normal table in the select list, so why can we put a set returning
function there? Ie, is it really a feature?

--
/Dennis Björklund

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: set returning function
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: set returning function