Re: SQL_ASCII and UNICODE server_encoding - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Achilleus Mantzios
Subject Re: SQL_ASCII and UNICODE server_encoding
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0408161741160.29055-100000@matrix.gatewaynet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SQL_ASCII and UNICODE server_encoding  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-sql
O kyrios Tom Lane egrapse stis Aug 16, 2004 :

> Achilleus Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> writes:
> > So if SQL_ASCII should be fine for UTF-8 storage.
> > (here i must have missed something, tho..), whats
> > the purpose of server_encoding=UNICODE?
> 
> If you use SQL_ASCII, the server will *store* Unicode just fine, but
> it won't *know* it is Unicode.  So if you just want raw data storage
> it doesn't matter.  If you would like to sort the data, upper-case 
> or lower-case it, or have automatic conversions to different client
> encodings, you had better tell the server the truth about what it
> is storing.

Thanx, i guess i didnt realize the value of conversion,sorting,etc...

> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
> 
>                http://archives.postgresql.org
> 

-- 
-Achilleus



pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: SQL_ASCII and UNICODE server_encoding
Next
From: Markus Bertheau
Date:
Subject: any chance SQL ASSERTIONS will be implemented?