Re: validation of postgresql functions - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ben
Subject Re: validation of postgresql functions
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0310030928230.22485-100000@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to validation of postgresql functions  (dinosaur8000@yahoo.com (giant food))
List pgsql-general
I never found a way. Instead I hacked up a general stored proceedure
testbed. I was going to release it when I had some time to make it
somewhat clean, but if you're desperate for something now I can give you
what I've got....

On 29 Sep 2003, giant food wrote:

> Hi, I'm in the process of converting an Oracle database into
> postgresql. One thing I've noticed is that postgresql functions keep
> the entire function body in a string, e.g.:
>
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION f_do_something(varchar, numeric, varchar)
>   RETURNS varchar AS
> '
> ...
> '
>   LANGUAGE 'plpgsql' VOLATILE;
>
> The problem I'm having with this is that I can never find any errors
> in my functions until runtime, unlike with Oracle where the "create
> function" script will fail if, for example, I misspelled a table name.
>
> Is there any way to force postgresql to compile functions, without
> running them first?
>
> --Frank
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
>       joining column's datatypes do not match
>



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: administration with pgaccess
Next
From: Ron Johnson
Date:
Subject: Re: Server recommendations