Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0303191715070.3580-100000@peter.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian writes:

> True, but GUC seems like the way to go, and we have per-user/db settings
> for GUC.

But the required autocommit setting depends neither on the user nor the
database, it depends on the identity of the client application.  That type
of granularity is not offered by GUC.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut   peter_e@gmx.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Meskes
Date:
Subject: timestamp/date in ecpg
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: More outdated examples