Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
Date
Msg-id 200303201613.h2KGDGJ06549@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign  (Dave Cramer <dave@fastcrypt.com>)
Re: [INTERFACES] Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> 
> > True, but GUC seems like the way to go, and we have per-user/db settings
> > for GUC.
> 
> But the required autocommit setting depends neither on the user nor the
> database, it depends on the identity of the client application.  That type
> of granularity is not offered by GUC.

True, but the standard also requires autocommit off, so I can imagine
folks wanting it off by default for various users/database.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Larry Rosenman
Date:
Subject: Re: to_char support for intervals
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: More outdated examples