Tom Lane writes:
> I'm not eager to pick up evidently-poorly-thought-out features from a
> draft spec that is nowhere near being frozen. Anyway, didn't we decide
> that converging syntax with 200X was a bad idea if we weren't going to
> converge semantics?
I think we realized that the semantics are the same.
--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net
