Re: Explicite typecasting of functions - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Andreas Tille
Subject Re: Explicite typecasting of functions
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0208150908430.8253-100000@wr-linux02.rki.ivbb.bund.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Explicite typecasting of functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Explicite typecasting of functions  (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>)
List pgsql-sql
On Wed, 14 Aug 2002, Tom Lane wrote:

> I concur with Richard that Andreas needs to solve a different problem,
> but just for the record, the way you could do it is
>
>     CREATE TABLE without mentioning the default
>
>     CREATE FUNCTION
>
>     ALTER TABLE ... SET DEFAULT
>
> Note however that pg_dump is not bright enough to deduce that you did
> this.  It will dump the table definition first, with the DEFAULT clause,
> and so you'll have to do manual surgery on the dump file if you ever
> need to reload.
Hmmm, the original problem I wanted to solve using this function is that
pg_dump is not bright enough to store sequences.  I use a development
machine to build the database do a pg_dump and after this I try to
put this dump to the production (readonly) server.  This procedure
every time requires manual setting of the sequences.  I tried to avoid
this by the function.  Any better way to do this?

Kind regards
        Andreas.



pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Andreas Tille
Date:
Subject: Re: Explicite typecasting of functions
Next
From: Richard Huxton
Date:
Subject: Re: Explicite typecasting of functions