Re: [PATCHES] START TRANSACTION - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [PATCHES] START TRANSACTION
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0208040007020.29827-100000@cm-lcon1-46-187.cm.vtr.net
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [PATCHES] START TRANSACTION  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut dijo: 

> Neil Conway writes:
> 
> > The attached patch implements START TRANSACTION, per SQL99. The
> > functionality of the command is basically identical to that of
> > BEGIN; it just accepts a few extra options (only one of which
> > PostgreSQL currently implements), and is standards-compliant.
> > The patch includes a simple regression test and documentation.
> 
> Very nice patch, but I don't think we need the regression test.  It's a
> bit too simple.

That makes me wonder: should I produce some regression tests for
CLUSTER?

-- 
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[a]atentus.com>)
"Investigación es lo que hago cuando no sé lo que estoy haciendo"
(Wernher von Braun)



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: getpid() function
Next
From: Curt Sampson
Date:
Subject: Re: Why is MySQL more chosen over PostgreSQL?