On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Marshall Spight wrote:
> "Curt Sampson" <cjs@cynic.net> wrote in message news:Pine.NEB.4.44.0207131908540.454-100000@angelic.cynic.net...
> >
> > Well, yeah, but it's really time to kill, properly, this idea that
> > postgres is always slower than mysql. I'm reasonably convinced that
> > under fairly heavy OLTP loads with some large queries going, MySQL would
> > grind to a halt at loads much less than postgres can handle.
>
> We did a bunch of benchmarking at work, using real datasets from
> our application, as well as synthetic benchmarks. A very wide
> variety of db operations were measured, using postgres, and mysql
> with innodb and myisam tables.
>
> Although I am a huge postgres fan, and will not be switching myself,
> I have to admit that as far as a race goes, mysql is the clear winner.
> In our tests, it was drastically faster than postgres. It really bummed
> me out.
Just wondering what version of postgresql you were running, and how much
optimization was done to the postgresql.conf file before testing, as the
default is really quite lowest common denominator.
