Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From D. Hageman
Subject Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.44.0202071728380.1533-100000@typhon.eecs.ku.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server  (Doug McNaught <doug@wireboard.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 7 Feb 2002, Doug McNaught wrote:

> "D. Hageman" <dhageman@dracken.com> writes:
> 
> > (3) Parallelize house keeping (for example vacuums) of the database.  I 
> > think they are going to call this processes or something slated for the 
> > next version? 
> > 
> > (4) Replication
> > 
> > (5) Referential Integritity cleanups
> > 
> > (6) EXOTIC FEATURES: crossdb
> 
> I fail to see how threads are required for any of these.  They could
> just as well be done with a separate process(es) in the current model.
> 

Oh, I didn't realize the conversation was about what threads was 
"required" for completing.  My mistake ... *cough* *cough*

-- 
//========================================================\\
||  D. Hageman                    <dhageman@dracken.com>  ||
\\========================================================//



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Doug McNaught
Date:
Subject: Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: JOINs ... how I hate them ...