Re: MATCH FULL flawed? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: MATCH FULL flawed?
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.33L2.0110222357500.11257-100000@aguila.protecne.cl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: MATCH FULL flawed?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: MATCH FULL flawed?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: MATCH FULL flawed?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-general
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Tom Lane wrote:

> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@atentus.com> writes:
> > I'm trying MATCH FULL and it looks like it doesn't work (does anyone use
> > it anyway?).
>
> You're not using it right.  You specified a separate MATCH FULL
> constraint for each column:

Thank you very much for the clarification. I was actually reading the
docs and couldn't find the right way to do it.

Now that I think about it: it's in the column_constraint part of the
definition! Shouldn't it only be in the table_constraint part? It
doesn't make much sense.

--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[@]atentus.com>)
"La verdad no siempre es bonita, pero el hambre de ella si"




pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Record
Next
From: "Aasmund Midttun Godal"
Date:
Subject: Re: Evaluating PostgreSQL