Not so much, I think it's "Postgresql specific stuff goes in the
postgresql track, generic database stuff goes in MySQL cause that's what
more people are running. Which sorta kinda makes sense. But I would
rather have had a SQL track that was for postgresql/firebirdsql/mysql
generic stuff like db design and Celko's presentation, and individual
tracks as warranted for db specific stuff like replication or what not.
But I'm not going this year (at least I don't think so) so...
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Robert Bernier wrote:
> It sounds like they want to do "all things" under the mysql banner. Does
> that sound right to you guys?
>
> Robert Treat wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 2004-04-09 at 13:19, scott.marlowe wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On 9 Apr 2004, Robert Treat wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>I haven't given things a thorough look over yet, but I did notice that
> >>>Joe Celko will be presenting (it's on the my$ql track of all places),
> >>>which might be of interest to PostgreSQL users... in fact, Josh, do you
> >>>know if we can get that tagged into our track as well? It doesn't
> >>>conflict with anything in our track AFAICS.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Yeah, a tutorial on Advanced SQL in the MySQL Track? and it covers things
> >>like check() constraints. Seems like there should just be a plain
> >>"database tutorials" track, as his being part of MySQL makes little or no
> >>sense.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Actually looking at it a bit more, this does seem like a mistake because
> >there is another my$ql specific tutorial going on at the same time...
> >"Data Warehousing with MySQL and OSS Tools"... while our track has no
> >tutorial at that time.
> >
> >
> >
> >>I'm pretty sure Joe is on one or two of our mailing lists, so if he sees
> >>this maybe he can clarify why they put him on the MySQL list instead of
> >>Postgresql or firebird. I'm certain MySQL is NOT his favorite open source
> >>database.
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
