On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, Oliver Jowett wrote:
> One issue with the DataSource mapping is that it gets harder to support
> a whole family of parameters (e.g. the guc_ prefix suggested) in one go,
> as we need to know the exact set of parameters we support at compile
> time so we can declare the necessary accessor methods. Maybe we could
> provide a catchall accessor (setExtraParameters()?) that takes a
> Properties object or similar.
Yes, supporting all GUC options is something we certainly wouldn't want to
do by providing a method for each one. Especially since different server
versions have different options and syntax. I imagine setGUC(String name,
String value) would be sufficient. I suppose also we would have to be
aware of GUC options that the driver sets itself (like datestyle and
client_encoding) to ensure that these are not overwritten.
Kris Jurka
